Jump to content

Talk:Johann Reinhold Forster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

According to the Colombia Encyclopedia ( http://www.bartleby.com/65/fo/ForsterJR.html ) and the Britannica ( http://www.britannica.com/eb/idx?idxid=214014&alphakey=f&seq=117144 ) he was German. Not Polish, not Greek, not Chinese. Burschenschafter

The articles you quote are stubs, if that. They don't mention the place where he was born which you constantly try to "germanize". We go into a lot of details. Instead of "Ger. Expl." we explain : "Polish born of German descent". He was born (and his whole family) in POLAND, not Greece, China nor Germany. Especially, not Germany!Space Cadet 19:48, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)


SC, Oh what nonsense !!! Again incorrect and unreliable wikipedia entries


Moving facts here, because of repeated reverts and insertion of false info on article.

Johann Reinhold Forster (October 22, 1729 - December 9, 1798) was a German naturalist.

Forster made contributions to the early ornithology of Europe and North America. He is best known as the naturalist on James Cook's second Pacific voyage, when he was accompanied by his son Georg Forster.

Forster was born in Dirschau in Prussia at the time of the Prince Elector Kurfürst Friedrich August II. Wettin. Dirschau, now known as Tczew/Poland), is located twenty miles south of Danzig/Gdansk. Forster studied theology at the University of Halle, Germany, afterwards serving as a Lutheran pastor....


Space Cadet, I see that you have not stopped sabotaging wikipedia articles. Is it, that the chauvanist extrem nationalist and communist upbringing in Poland is so ingrained in you bunch of wikipedians, that you just have to distort everything, because you see it through red- not pink- glasses, just like comrad # 1 before you? Anyone with historical knowledge can see right through this b.s., however many of the gullible en-wikipedia readers might even believe some of it. No wonder you are having so much fun inputting incorrect and unreliable wikipedia entries.


Dear anon. You resort to calling me names and suggesting that I'm a brainwashed commie, with no mind of my own, yet you don't say one word in defense of your preposterous "XIX century Prussian historiography(?)" edits. Good going! Yours truly, Space Cadet 17:54, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)


Official Records of inhabitants of Dirschau, Westprussia since 1600's [1]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:34, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lutheran pastor ??

[edit]

Although many encyclopedic sources cited here assign J.R. Forster to the Lutheran denomination, probably more or less automatically because he was a subject of the later very Lutheran kingdom of Prussia, he was in fact a pastor of the "Reformed Protestant" (i.e. Calvinist) church in Dierschau (which had no Lutheran church); this also fits his Scottisch family origins. See also the "Talk" for the Wikipedia entry on his son George. I have replaced the first footnote by a reference to his 1878 biography (in German) in "Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie", where this is clearly stated. --83.76.130.1 (talk) 17:17, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He was German and born in Germany

[edit]

This Article has some serious mistakes. The place where he was born was in this time NOT Poland, it was Germany (State of Prussia)! It was only after 1945 occupied, so many hundred Years later. And he was of cause German. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.204.246.135 (talk) 15:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Before the First Partition of Poland, the place was in Poland... —Kusma (t·c) 16:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]

The Forsters in the South Sea
The Forsters in the South Sea
5x expanded by Kusma (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 58 past nominations.

Kusma (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Johann Reinhold Forster/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Kusma (talk · contribs) 15:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 09:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will be reviewing this article and will have comments here soon. Alexeyevitch(talk) 09:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  • On an excursion, Forster found a lake that was later named "Lake Forster - could be more detailed... I assume this was in Fiordland, because that is where Tamatea / Dusky Sound is.
  • Maybe gloss Honoris causa if it means something like an "honorary degree" in common English.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  • withdrawn himself from the voyage.". - remove period
  • Queen Charlotte Sound → Queen Charlotte Sound / Tōtaranui - common name
  • Dusky Sound → Tamatea / Dusky Sound - common name
  • honor → honour - I prefer American English, though this article appears to be written mostly in British English and this spelling should be changed for consistency.
  • "Plymouth" could be linked
  • "Halle (Saale)" could also be linked
  • University of Halle is linked numerous times and HMS Resolution is linked twice in the same section - dup wlinks
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  • Ref layout is satisfactory.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
  • I have no issues with the reliabilty of the sources and there also appears to be no uncited paragraphs, so a thumbs up from me.
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
  • Perhaps mention the memorial of him in the article.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  • This article is a good overview of his life and doesn't go off-topic. Passed.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  • No issues of neutrality. Passed.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  • Article is stable and free of edit wars. Passed.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
  • Image of church is licensed properly. checkY
  • Image of Lake Elton is licensed properly. checkY
  • Source URL of Warrington image is dead. 🚨
  • Image of Joseph Banks is licensed properly. checkY
  • Source URL for Thomas Pennant image is dead. 🚨
  • Image of Forster's tomb is licensed properly. checkY
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.