Talk:Cinema of Australia

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2016; 2017;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Australia: Cinema High‑importance

	Australia portal Cinema of Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Film: Australian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Village Roadshow Limited#Warner Roadshow Studios|Warner Roadshow Studios]] The anchor (#Warner Roadshow Studios) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Article is unwieldy

I suggest cutting out the list of actors, and the gallery - perhaps scatter a couple of the most well-known in the body. This article is just too long and unwieldy. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indigenous Filmmakers are entirely missing from this article?

It might be a good idea to add a section about indigenous filmmakers. There are some incredibly important projects that have been created by the community and I personally find it extremely odd that an article about Australian cinema makes minimal reference to the Aboriginal community or any actors/creators whatsoever. *Katnotcat (talk) 17:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The hard part is finding reputable independent sources. Doug butler (talk) 21:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Cinema in Australia is subject to censorship" should not be in the lead section

While classification is a worthwhile topic to be included in the article, having it as its own paragraph in the lead section is bizarre and doesn't make much sense. The U.K. also has a government-run classification system that can de facto make it illegal to sell or show films, but there isn't a paragraph on it on the "Cinema of the U.K." article. Calling it censorship is also an odd choice. While Media that is Refused Classification is illegal to sell, rent, etc., it is not illegal to own or consume, and it is very rare especially today for media to be refused classification. The line feels partisan and does not give the reader an unbiased representation of Australian cinema. Stapler42 (talk) 08:37, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archives (Index)
2012 2016 2017
This page is archived by ClueBot III.