Edinburgh was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Edinburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EdinburghWikipedia:WikiProject EdinburghTemplate:WikiProject EdinburghEdinburgh
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hanseatic League, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Hanseatic LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject Hanseatic LeagueTemplate:WikiProject Hanseatic LeagueHanseatic League
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh Festival Fringe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Edinburgh Festival FringeWikipedia:WikiProject Edinburgh Festival FringeTemplate:WikiProject Edinburgh Festival FringeEdinburgh Festival Fringe
This article is written in Scottish English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
@Goodreg3, I do not think that the six-image version of the infobox collage is an improvement, as the individual images are too small to clearly see. In particular, the horizontal width of the Scottish Parliament image means the Scott Monument image is very narrow. Separately, the image of the city's skyline is of poor quality, being blurry in the details and over-saturated. Six images also leads to a rather long infobox, which is not desirable.
The four-image version of the infobox college created by myself mitigates these issues. The skyline image has better colours (although we do lack a good high-res image), and the use of a cropped image of the Scottish Parliament allows the image of the Scott Monument to be larger. A.D.Hope (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with the current version of six images. It’s common for cities to have this number of images in their infobox (some even have more than 6 which is arguably too much, however…). Goodreg3 (talk) 19:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fact it's become common for cities to have large infobox collages doesn't necessarily mean this is a good practice, or that it should be universally applied. In Edinburgh's case, the four-image version works better as each image is clearer. A.D.Hope (talk) 07:58, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
